When tragic harm occurs online, building a powerful legal case requires more than passion—it demands precision, experience, and an unwavering commitment to justice. In the growing legal battle over Roblox and Discord’s safety failures, Dolman Law Group has emerged as a determined force challenging how these platforms treat the most vulnerable.
Dolman Law Group strategically combines legal expertise, child-safety advocacy, and a wealth of real-world evidence to craft compelling lawsuits that aim not only to seek compensation but also to force systemic change.
Foundation of the Lawsuits: A Real Story, Real Harm
At the heart of Dolman’s litigation is a distressing case involving a Florida minor who was groomed through chat features on Roblox and Discord. Filed in San Mateo County, California, the lawsuit alleges that both platforms allowed dangerous, unsupervised interactions while presenting themselves as safe environments for children.
The firm states: “Tech platforms that target kids have a heightened responsibility to protect them. Roblox and Discord failed at every level—and a child suffered because of it.”
Strategic Legal Focus: Negligence, Design Flaws & Misleading Messaging
Dolman’s complaint emphasizes three main pillars:
- Negligent Design & Safety Failures
The lawsuit asserts that Roblox and Discord’s infrastructure permits unsupervised access by potential predators—even when safety tools are in use. Roblox, in particular, allowed access to sexualized “bathhouses” through design oversights.
- Targeted Misrepresentation
Though promoted as kid-friendly, both companies allegedly misled parents and users about their actual safety protections. Discord’s minimal moderation allowed grooming to continue off-platform without effective oversight.
- Systemic Harm and Preventability
The firm presents a case that these tragedies were avoidable. With basic safeguards, such as stronger age verification and stricter moderation, the harm could have been prevented. Their lawsuits push not only for compensation but also meaningful platform reforms.
Empowering Clients and Recovering Compensation
Dolman Law Group brings years of experience in mass tort and personal injury law to this fight. Attorney Matthew Dolman and his team prioritize client care, offering free consultations and working on a contingency-fee basis—meaning clients pay nothing unless the firm wins.
Their track record speaks volumes. This kind of background ensures they have both the legal strength and practical experience needed to take on powerful tech companies.
Multi-Jurisdictional Approach & Escalating Momentum
Dolman isn’t stopping at one case. Their approach spans multiple states, reinforcing patterns of harm and corporate negligence.
- California Case: Filed in July 2025 on behalf of a Florida minor, alleging grooming and platform failure.
- Texas Case: Filed in August 2025, this suit represents an 8-year-old boy who was allegedly manipulated through the promise of in-game currency (Robux) in exchange for inappropriate images.
By filing across jurisdictions, the firm builds momentum and lays the groundwork for broader accountability—potentially leading to consolidated litigation or even federal scrutiny.
Why This Strategy Matters
- Real stories, real people — These lawsuits stem from true, traumatic events. They aren’t theoretical, they’re painfully real.
- Evidence-backed claims — Allegations are grounded in platform mechanics, chat logs, in-game currencies, and design choices that allowed abuse to occur.
- Holistic advocacy — Legal claims are supported by emotional, social, and ethical arguments for reform.
- Client-centered process — The firm works on a no-win, no-fee basis and treats each client with personal care and attention.
Key Takeaways
- Dolman Law Group is using its litigation experience to build strong, fact-based cases against Roblox and Discord, centered on child exploitation.
- The firm’s claims are built on themes of negligent design, inadequate safety tools, and misleading marketing to families.
- Filing in multiple states helps create legal pressure and shows a recurring pattern of harm.
- Beyond financial compensation, the firm seeks real accountability and meaningful change in how platforms protect minors.